I do not run the @NeverNateinErie account. I do not know who runs it (although I have my suspicions). I reckon Nate and his duo of henchpeople think it’s mine but I swear and aver that it isn’t me and I don’t have time for it. But I follow and like that person’s very spot-on replies.
You should follow it, too, if for no other reason than Nate tried to get me canceled assuming it was me.
The population of people who know why I stopped tweeting in May 2020 is pretty small. Nate McMurray is one of them, and he is so low and dishonorable that he used it against me in an effort to silence me, this blog, my voice, and any scrutiny of his foundering campaign.
Congratulations, Nate or whoever made up that account. Consider me silenced.
Not much just a nominal Democrat hobnobbing with MAGA.
And if you want to know about hysterics just wait until you see the last text exchange I had with him. This guy is a massive hypocrite and he makes Trump look calm and collected by comparison.
On Thursday and Friday February 16th and 17th, Cheektowaga Councilman Brian Nowak interacted with County Executive candidate Nate McMurray.
The difference here is that Brian is an elected official and very well-informed. He knows what he’s talking about.
Nate isn’t and doesn’t.
Yet that doesn’t prevent Nate from being condescending to Brian in an absurd way. (click the image to enlarge)
Chances are slim that McMurray makes it past petitions to merit even a response from Poloncarz on a “debate”, but look at how he interacts with Brian, who points out that ego should take a back seat to achievement and defending past achievements. Nate has a lot of the former, few of the latter. But he is to be lauded for rendering himself unemployable except for a shaky entry into being a litigation attorney.
He immediately lunges at Nowak, making him out to be a Poloncarz shill by quizzing him on three bullet points on which he has fixated. Nowak responds, deftly. (Again, click to expand)
So, in response to Nowak, McMurray lashes out with feigned incredulity and then proceeds to insult Nowak, who responds by reminding McMurray that it is he who is running for CE, and again schooling him on the fact that governing involves myriad competing interests and associated minutiae.
Then Nate pivots to his love of IKEA (born from his Scandinavian travel, despite the fact that IKEA exists on every populated continent on Earth.) It is another McMurray flex – he’s better than you because he made more than you – is better traveled than you.
Nowak then reminds McMurray that the 14% poverty rate in Erie County is not caused by – or fixable by – one man. (Remember the other day I referred to McMurray’s declarations about poverty to be akin to Trumpism’s “he alone can fix it.“)
McMurray then again offers a non-responsive insult by claiming we have the “worst job market in the country” (citation, please), and that Buffalo “is the third poorest city in the country,” which really should be directed to the city’s government.
Then he asks, rhetorically, as if this is Nowak’s responsibility to answer, “what is the legacy of [Poloncarz]”? I personally think the legacy is to restore faith in county government. To deliver excellent results with a renewed focus on what matters to people. To be a responsible and capable steward of the public purse. To navigate through two negotiations with the Bills and a pandemic. To restore Erie County to fiscal responsibility, improve our credit rating, improve our infrastructure, and to ensure that county departments and services are constantly improving.
Anyone who thinks there hasn’t been positive change between 2012 – 2023, as compared with 2000 – 2011 is lying, an idiot, or was simply absent from the area. Anyone with even a passing, hearsay recollection of Mssrs. Giambra and Collins know how much better, more competent, more responsive, and more people-focused our county government is now.
That’s why we don’t necessarily need some quasi-informed cowboy spouting off about undefined “change” because that sounds a lot like 1999 speaking. “Challenging authority” is for loudmouth adolescents, and is not a positive for its own sake. It really underscores the fact that the driving force that informs McMurray’s candidacy is score-settling and grievance. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the nuts and bolts of running a county government.
As Nowak, notes, “Only the guy who isn’t rowing has time to rock the boat.” *Chef’s kiss.*
…if two individuals in the same tax jurisdiction live in properties with the same values, they pay the same amount of property tax, regardless of their incomes.
Anyhow, Nate here used to be the supervisor of a small town, so he knows how this works – yet again, he’s assuming you don’t and that you’re dumb and gullible. The county, after all, does not set the assessments – the towns do. The county merely sets the rate, which has gone down continuously as property values appreciated.
And those taxes pay for all of the things that County Executives actually oversee, as opposed to international rail and state projects.
The County Executive – the County – doesn’t run the Library system. They help to fund the library, but they don’t get involved in day-to-day operations.
As for the disruptions, those were a topic for discussion at yesterday’s meeting and the administration is dealing with that situation, which is far too complex than some tweeter calling the libraries “places of violence and disrepair” in order to politicize something apolitical.
Finally, Nate keeps saying Buffalo has the “worst job market in the country.”
I would love to see a citation to that purported fact. Maybe it’s just “vibes.”
The only change Nate McMurray would bring is a return to fiscal irresponsibility, relentless politicization of apolitical things, settling of scores, endless grievance, and a lot of time wasted on stuff that has nothing to do with running a county.
Korea, Singapore, Denmark, and the United Kingdom. These are Nate’s examples of better, “free”, cheaper healthcare.
It’s true, Korea’s system is an excellent universal healthcare scheme. It is essentially a single-payer system.
Singapore, however, is not a single-payer system. It is a hybrid that puts an emphasis on health savings accounts and is currently a darling of American conservative commentators and think-tanks. So, using Singapore to extol the virtues of a proposed NYS-based single-payer plan is bullshit.
Finally, the UK and her NHS. It is Britain’s pride and joy, which has been weakened to the point of crisis by a decade and a half of Tory rule, marked first by its disastrous austerity programs, followed by the autosanctions of Brexit and a concomitant exodus and resulting shortage of nurses, doctors, and aides. If anything, the Tory gutting of the NHS is a perfect example of the perils of government-run and taxpayer-funded single-payer schemes. (This is before we get into the fact that the UK also allows for a private healthcare market outside the NHS, which Canada, for instance, does not allow).
Weird, isn’t it, that Mr. Binational-let’s-run-trains-in-a-NY-Ontario-Schengen didn’t mention Canadian Medicare?
Anyhow, one of the biggest mistakes that proponents of single-payer plans commit is to call it “free.” It’s not free – it’s paid for through taxes and fees. European countries have higher rates of income taxation and value-added sales taxes help to fund their social services. Sales taxes in some European countries exceed 20%. In Ontario, the HST (used to be GST and PST) is 13%. It’s 15% in the Maritimes and Quebec (which still separates QST and GST).
New Yorkers are taxed quite highly already, and we have full and robust implementation of Obamacare and Medicaid expansion. While universal health coverage is a longstanding platform plank of Democrats, there are many different ways in which this might be accomplished. It is not a stretch for people to be wary of what a Republican-led State Senate or a Republican governor might do to implement austerity on a single-payer state plan if for no other reason but to establish that it doesn’t work.
Heard of Geely? It’s a Chinese care company that owns Volvo and Lynk & Co, which are poised to go all-electric in a few years. BYD is not in the American market, which is why “no one here ever heard of them.” Although they had a presence at the NAIAS a decade ago, BYD is not about to enter the American market, and if it did, it would likely have to build cars here. But, seriously, what’s the point of this particular brain-fart? I mean, people are already on it, guy. You’re reacting to something on Twitter that people in authority are already doing. Go have a Chips Ahoy and go home.
McMurray expends a tremendous amount of time viciously attacking Democrats, and has done so quite regularly since his last failed campaign for Congress. This time last year he was absolutely beside himself that Brian Higgins wouldn’t demand that Chris Jacobs resign over his vote against certifying the 2020 election. He was angry that Higgins wouldn’t do some pointless performative thing – as if that would give Jacobs pause and really allow him to reflect on his ways.
In the end, the only thing that got Jacobs to effectively quit is his reaction to the Tops massacre and his sudden support of an assault weapons ban. A step to far for the “pro-life” party.
Anyway, Nate is totally on top of things, like this, which he figures supports his plan to – as County Executive – execute a treaty with Canada that would facilitate the movement of people, things, jobs, and money.
The New York State Health Act would create a single payer health insurance scheme in New York State. That might be a good idea, but the goal is universal coverage. How you get there doesn’t really matter, and each method has its pros and cons. I don’t know if I would want a future Republican governor or legislature in charge of a single-payer state-run program.
I don’t know what it means that he “bows to billionaires and developers” and frankly it’s pretty rich coming from a guy who is suing his billionaire former employer. I don’t know what it means to say that Mark “rejected bail reform” or “never focused on rail”. The former is just a lie, and the latter is also just a lie. Whether Mark Poloncarz told Nate McMurray to shut up about Trump, I have no idea, but as others have pointed out, it is a bad idea for a candidate ever to insult voters.
Mark is a “tyrant” because he’s so good at his job that people won’t vote him out. That’s sort of like how in Nate’s lawsuit against Delaware North, he points out that he was a well-reviewed employee. By the way, Dennis Gorski served in public office from 1972 – 1999, the last 11 as County Executive before he lost to someone who came in as a former Democrat who was going to be a disruptor and shake things up – Joel Giambra.
It’s nice, however, of Nate to assume that Mark is going to win in order to make his math work.
There’s definitely a joke. Nothing says “trust me, I’m competent” like either lying or being wrong about so many easily researchable facts. A billion dollars? No. $130M of County money for stadium upgrades and $250M of County money towards a new stadium. State money doesn’t count in a criticism of the County Executive. Nate’s only off by only 2/3rds of a billion there. That’s the kind of fiscal know-how we really need!
Nate has no fundamental concept of how a municipal budget is developed. Instead claiming the guy who’s had 12 consecutive balanced budgets with either year-end surpluses or minor easily bridged deficits is fiscally irresponsible and up to funny business.
What he asked Biden for yesterday is something completely different – a “major disaster” declaration, which frees up even more FEMA money for storm response and cleanup costs.
But this is what you can expect from Nate McMurray – barely informed accusations and a fountain of grievance. I don’t think Erie County deserves being stuck with a faux-leftist mini-Trump.