And An Elevator To the Moon

Not real, authentic (This Stadium Matters; Stadium, For Real)

Way back in late 2004/early 2005, one of the first Buffalocentric topics about which I decided to write was an NFTA debate that was then brewing over three competing plans for Buffalo’s beleaguered, forgotten Outer Harbor. Eight or so years later, it remains almost equally beleaguered, with some aesthetic and functional improvements in access, but still amounting to grass and weeds. Eight or so years later, the NFTA still controls it, while the Erie Canal Harbor Development Corporation and the City of Buffalo bicker over who should control its development, and the contracts and jobs that go with it. 

What else have we seen? We’ve seen that while civic debate focuses on extremes, we are capable of reaching compromise when necessary. For instance, attracting a Bass Pro to the waterfront – it wasn’t at all a bad idea. Putting it in the Aud, on the Aud site, or even right up against the water at the foot of Main Street – none of those were per se bad ideas. But Bass Pro isn’t coming, and that, too, is OK. We don’t need it, but it wouldn’t have hurt. On the other side of the argument, we had the armies of preservation demanding green space, no buildings against the water, “authenticity” as defined by them, and now a fetish for defunct grain elevators and warehouses that haven’t been demolished because there is no one to pay to demolish them – haven’t been used because they are economically difficult to justify re-using. In spite of the Fred Kent placemaking sideshow scam, Buffalonians seem pretty happy with the compromise Canalside being built, the Pegula hockeytorium, and the other incremental – but, finally, visible and palpable – improvements being done to the Inner Harbor. 

So, we look again to the Outer Harbor and we have a new proposal being trial-ballooned whereby we build a billion-and-a-half-dollar stadium for the Buffalo Bills with a retractable roof, a new convention center, a hotel complex, and 5,000 parking spots. Of the silver bullet proposals to come down the road, this is the silveriest, bulletiest of them all.  This has a former county comptroller candidate involved in commissioning an epic set of images showing off our newest Elevator to the Moon, complete with a sports museum to be built and run by the people behind Rochester’s Strong Museum of Play. 

Neighborhoods crumble under the weight of economic decay and desperation, and we have $1.5 billion to spend on playing catch? We struggle to make ends meet with Medicaid funding, heating assistance, and day care for the working poor, and we’ll throw a billion dollars at a hotel and Buffalo Skydome? Is there even a local corporate sponsor who will buy naming rights, or will we just name it after Ralph Wilson, too? Renovating the Ralph is estimated to cost $200 million, which is also a tremendous sum of money for this area, and even that is a deal not yet done. For decades this region has been trampled underfoot by opportunistic politicians with toxic policies, and we have yet to devise an attainable vision for the future and a concomitant plan to get there.  But, hey – domed. Stadium

Functionally, the Outer Harbor is a geographical bottleneck – accessible by Skyway or on Route 5 from the South or in from Tifft Blvd from South Buffalo.  Three points of entry to get to 5,000 parking spots to service a stadium for 72,000 people. Arithmetically, the people behind this proposal think that the state will pony up $400 million, and that the NFL will provide between $200 to $400 million. That leaves a gap of $700 to $900 million that needs to be filled by private investment and, presumably, county money. That kind of money approaches the county’s entire annual budget. As a practical matter, the soil on the Outer Harbor is toxic and in need of multimillion dollar remediation. 

But we’re still debating the likelihood that the Bills stay in this region after their owner inevitably passes away in the near future. The team is more than just a sports franchise – it’s a powerful symbol reminding Buffalo that it was once in the major leagues; a legacy we cling to by a thread.  Does this area have enough idle money lying around to (a) enable local investors to buy the Bills and keep them here when Wilson dies; and (b) fund a massive stadium project for the Outer Harbor, which would effectively prohibit any other kind of development from happening there? 

So here we are, with a massive silver bullet pipe dream to try and keep our disappointing football team in town. A shiny object to raise the hopes of the few not yet beaten down by inevitable cynicism; something to occupy hours’ worth of inane AM talk radio chatter, with angry people talking angrily about their anger over money and the crappy team. This has the appearance of being aspirational, but is really evidence of desperation. If we give the Bills this nice new home, maybe they’ll stay. Maybe they’ll stop sucking. On the other hand, we’ll have the self-appointed masters of authenticity decry any proposal involving sports, parking, roadways. We’ll have arguments about how we should spend a billion dollars to improve storefronts on Grant Street, or maybe to spend on more ancillary projects at the Darwin Martin House. We’ll hear how Buffalo is “real” and “authentic” and that this monstrosity does nothing to further enhance our standing as a tertiary stopover on the cultural tourism checklist. We’ll ultimately argue over how many trees and painted Adirondack chairs are available on the grass, whether the water taxi will be able to accommodate gameday crowds, and hey, how about a solar-powered carousel? 

But let’s cut through all the hype. The people proposing this have two things – a corporate entity and some diagrams. They haven’t talked to the Bills. They haven’t talked to the NFL. They haven’t talked to the State. They haven’t talked to ECHDC. They haven’t talked to the NFTA. They haven’t even taken a survey of the local population to vet the idea of a billion-dollar domed stadium on the Outer Harbor. So far, they’re scheduled only to speak with the City of Buffalo – an entity that has, and would have, no say in the matter whatsoever. We haven’t yet figured out how we’re going to fix up Ralph Wilson Stadium, and we’re already talking about out-Torontoing Toronto’s downtown Rogers Centre. 

This ought to be fun. 




  • Your final point is the one that I jumped on when I first read the story. 

    This makes about as much sense as someone proposing to build a new corporate HQ for Rich Products without talking to them first. 

    While it’s bad enough that people come up with this stuff in the first place, it’s almost as sad that the local media eats it up and will give it unjustified coverage for the next week. 

  • “Authentic” and “real” is rebuilding War Memorial Stadium in its original spot, complete with sightline-obstructing beams, seating that will keep local orthopedic surgeons and chiropractors busy for years to come, and “co’ beer here!” being a recreation of Simon Pure, especially for those authenticity-seeking sports fans that don’t remember their grandfathers’ tales about how they regularly drank the stuff to keep themselves “as regular as da’ number 4 cars”.

    Waterfront and downtown football stadiums strike a chord among both the local armchair quarterback and armchair planner crowd.  Big idea, but terrible locations.  Seriously, if the powers that be envision a vibrant, active waterfront, in the style of Chicago, Toronto and so on, the very last thing that should be considered to be sited along the bulk of its shoreline is a stadium that is used for 10 to 15 days a year. Not the most efficient, nor the highest and best use of what should be valuable real estate.

    “What about Cleveland?”, many ask.  Cleveland’s waterfront is adjacent to its downtown, not a hop across a mile-long bridge.  Browns fans that don’t take the Rapid in have plenty of options to park, in lots and ramps that otherwise serve office workers during the day, and theater and nightlife crowds in the evening.  It’s a bit of a walk from Tower City or the ramps to the stadium, but walk they will, filtering through the streets of downtown.  Could that work in Buffalo, where there’s the expectation of convenient parking, and the “authentic” tailgating scene is sacrosanct?  Maybe, but it would be an extremely hard sell.

    “So, Dan, got any better ideas on where a stadium should go?”  A few, all locations with flaws.  The Lower East Side, with under-trafficked arterial streets easy access to Buffalo’s expressway network.  You’re going to have to say goodbye to some “authentic”, “real” and “historic” workman’s cottages, though, lonely as they may be on the growing urban prairie.  Maybe the site of what’s left of Thruway Plaza.  

    OP might seem out of the way, but Rich Stadium was built, it was expected that the Outer Beltway would be built nearby at some point, providing easy access to the eastern and northern ‘burbs.   The Beltway plans were shelved, with only short sections of the highway being built, and today the stadium’s location still seems remote.  Still, it’s not a terrible site.  Not everything can be in the Northtowns.

  • Every thing that happens with this team feels like deliberate manipulation of Bills’ fans’ emotions, being a Bills’ fan I now feel more entitled to my paranoia and deep ennui.

  • You’re going to do a podcast with me tomorrow, right?  

  • Thirty years ago the waterfront stadium idea was nixed because it made no sense to build a football stadium (or any stadium) next to the water.   Some obnoxious fool probably asked the question “What has football got to do with the water?” –  and no one had an answer. 

    There are plenty of great uses for the waterfront but stadiums aren’t among them, especially when ferocious winds blow the full fetch of  the lake all the way from Detroit.   We laid this silver bullet plan to rest a long time ago, but like a zombie, it keeps coming to life. 

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.