Conservative “Humor”
[blackbirdpie url=”https://twitter.com/#!/MonicaCrowley/status/195558620920954880″]
Monica Crowley is a Fox News “analyst”, whatever that means.
Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke testified to Congress some weeks ago about the importance and cost of contraceptive coverage for women in insurance plans. Not just for contraceptive uses, but also for medical uses involving, e.g., ovarian cysts. Because Fluke stood up for herself, for women, for her beliefs, she has been the target of a blistering, hateful series of attacks from such conservative philosophers as Rush Limbaugh.
Yesterday, news broke that Fluke had become engaged to be married. If you Google the exact term Crowley used in her Tweet, the Daily Beast article using that headline reveals that Fluke is engaged to her longtime boyfriend.
[blackbirdpie url=”https://twitter.com/#!/humanadverb/status/195568558628020224″]
[blackbirdpie url=”https://twitter.com/#!/MonicaCrowley/status/195569989875531776″]
Ah, but she was insinuating something. As I pointed out above, the articles announcing Fluke’s engagement noted to whom she was to be married. On top of that, it’s an old stereotype that feminist women who, for instance, don’t share the Nordic looks of most females on Fox News must all be lesbians. “Feminazis”, I think Limbaugh calls them.
[blackbirdpie url=”https://twitter.com/#!/MonicaCrowley/status/195565385901293568″]
Wait – first Crowley pleads seriousness – she claims it was a “straightforward question” to which she had received “no answer yet”. But now it was humor? What, exactly was the joke?
[blackbirdpie url=”https://twitter.com/#!/WhoMD/status/195587821237579778″]
[blackbirdpie url=”https://twitter.com/#!/MonicaCrowley/status/195589182385700864″]
Yes, shock horror – who would think that a Fox News “analyst” who made a homophobic quip against a heterosexual woman who was just engaged to be married would have a problem with lesbianism?
To her credit, Fluke responded thusly:
“I’m not going to let this kind of thing get to me personally,” Fluke said during an appearance on MSNBC’s “The Ed Show.” “What really bothers me about it [is] the blatant homophobia in the comment, and the idea that that is an acceptable thing to say publicly.”
“I don’t want an apology from anyone personally,” Fluke said. “I think it is possible she owes an apology to the LGBTQ community, because I am not offended to be asked whether or not I’m with a woman. It’s not offensive to me to be gay, but it was clearly meant as an insult.”
Mitt Romney is likely to lose in November, and when he does, the clamor from the right wing of the Republican Party is going to be deafening. They’re going to double down on the notion that Romney wasn’t conservative enough, and next time they’ll probably convince themselves to nominate someone like Santorum – or worse.
Then that person will be defeated worse than Romney. Because general election voters aren’t going to buy in to whatever a Santorum type is selling. Calling Sandra Fluke a whore may play great with the reactionary types who self-identify as tea partiers, but it doesn’t go over well with middle-of-the-road casual voters.
It’ll be at least a few more election cycles before Republicans start to look at less insane candidates for office. It took Democrats Carter, Mondale, and Dukakis before they settled on Clinton, and then we had to go through Kerry before we settled on someone new and inspiring.
In the meantime, let’s make fun of the strong woman with a short haircut, and call her a “lesbian”.
I don’t get the joke.
Too bad that education doesn’t temper the darkness. Crowley’s a Colgate grad and is a Colombia PhD. Instead of using her analytic and intellectual prowess to enlighten and inform, she’s elected to join the screaming jackals and hyenas of the right’s echo chamber and is well compensated for her services. Reminds me of a Woody Allen line about intellectuals: “They’ve proven how you can be absolutely brilliant and not know what’s going on.”
It’s been this way for years. The media crowed about Sarah Palin’s acceptance speech, when it was little more than a series of insults. Rush’s fans expect blatant hatred. He would have gone off the air years ago if he merely expounded upon traditional conservative ideology.
You can make a lot of money and get a lot of attention by simply appealing to assholes, who apparently now make up a strong, albeit minority, percentage of this country.
Terrific fake indignation over something meaningless not unlike when the Right jumped all over the analyst who “insulted all stay at home moms” by “attacking” Mrs. Romney. Silly season is well underway as we blow every stupid statement by those not running for office into an example of how the “other side” really feels.
Well, considering how Fluke was(and, in some parts of the ConWeb, still IS)made fun of just for stating her opinion in front of a Congressional hearing, it’s not that meaningless.